[Psc] GeoExt release procedure
Tim Schaub
tschaub at opengeo.org
Mon Jun 8 19:40:57 CEST 2009
Hey-
Bart van den Eijnden (OSGIS) wrote:
> Hey Tim,
>
> but currently the PSC archives are public:
>
> http://www.geoext.org/pipermail/psc/
>
Good point. Didn't know that.
So, I'd suggest either:
1) making the archive viewable to members only, or
2) creating a private list,
3) restricting all private conversation from any list
The reason for a private list is so we can mail each other about any
sensitive information (passwords, discussion about individuals, etc).
In any case, I think votes, discussion on procedure, etc still belong on
the dev list.
Tim
> Best regards,
> Bart
>
> Tim Schaub wrote:
>> Hey-
>>
>> Thanks for getting this going Andreas.
>>
>> One note about the use of this list. While OpenLayers was going
>> through the OSGeo incubation process, we were told that transparency
>> in governance was very important. Specifically, we were told not to
>> use a private list except when absolutely necessary. The OpenLayers
>> PSC list remains private, but it is only used for discussion that
>> involves individuals that should not be called out on a public list.
>>
>> So, I'd like to propose that we use the dev list for all of the
>> following:
>>
>> 1. Calls for votes.
>> 2. Discussion about procedure.
>> 3. Discussion about what should/should not go in the library.
>> 4. Schedules, meetings, administrivia.
>>
>> And, the PSC list should be restricted to the following:
>>
>> 1. Discussion about individuals. This includes any nomination of any
>> individual for commit rights, PSC membership, etc. Basically, if
>> we're going to vote on a person, we don't go public with the vote
>> until we know that we're all in favor.
>> 2. Discussion about any sensitive information that should not be
>> publicly logged.
>>
>> Also, though we don't want to rely on it too heavily, we can always
>> write directly to each other when we have something to say that might
>> not be appropriate for any list.
>>
>> Sound acceptable?
>>
>> Tim
>>
>>
>> Andreas Hocevar wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I created a draft for the GeoExt release procedure. Big credit goes to
>>> the OpenLayers community, since the release procedure is an only
>>> slightly modified copy of the OpenLayers procedure.
>>>
>>> http://www.geoext.org/trac/geoext/wiki/Release/Procedure
>>>
>>> Please feel free to modify/discuss the procedure. I would like to have
>>> a vote on a final draft by tomorrow (Jun 9) 17:00 GMT, so we can start
>>> the release process for the 0.5 release.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Andreas.
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Psc mailing list
>>> Psc at geoext.org
>>> http://www.geoext.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/psc
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
--
Tim Schaub
OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org
Expert service straight from the developers.
More information about the Psc
mailing list