[Users] storing extra properties on layers

[Patrick Valsecchi]

On Tuesday, 17 February 2009 19:03:10 Andreas Hocevar wrote:
> 1) a LayerStore that is always in sync with the map's layers array. Its
> recors have a reference to a leayer, plus all this required information.
> It would also make things like LayerTree more convenient to develop/use,
> because we don't always need a reference to the map, just to our
> LayerStore.
>
> Personally, I'd be in favor of 1).

+1