[Users] GeoExt 1.0?

[bartvde at osgis.nl]

Tim,

well-said, +1.

Best regards,
Bart

> Chris Holmes wrote:
>> What's on people's minds for the minimum component list that we need
>> before we call things '1.0'?
>>
>> The list in my mind (past what's already in core, which I think gets us
>> much of the way there) is something like:
>>
>> * Styling
>> * Editing tools (with WFS-T and backed to other persistence formats)
>> * Google Earth plugin
>> * 'Search' - generic components, plus specific things for geocoding,
>> geonames, etc.
>> * Printing
>> * As easy to add google maps or bing through the UI as it is to add WMS
>> layers (or close to as easy, may have to include a key)
>>
>
> I'm a bit late coming into this thread, but here's my opinion.  I'd be
> happy calling it 1.0 once we have solid Ext 3.x support.  I'd also like
> to do a review of the API and make sure we're happy with the names &
> patterns.
>
> I think all ux (and stuff listed above) can come after.  1.0 doesn't
> mean "done" or in any way "complete" to me.  It just means "solid."
>
> Tim
>
>> I'm psyched on the other UX components, but I don't personally see them
>> as essential.  What is on other people's lists?  What makes GeoExt a
>> compelling mapping toolkit?
>>
>> I think there will be a whole lot of interest once GeoExt gets past 1.0,
>> and it could be nice to define a roadmap / have an idea of what we're
>> shooting for.  Then once that core is reached effort should be shifted
>> from developing new components to getting what exists in to solid 1.0
>> state, with docs, examples etc.
>>
>> C
>>
>
>
> --
> Tim Schaub
> OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org
> Expert service straight from the developers.
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list
> Users at geoext.org
> http://www.geoext.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>