[Users] GeoExt 1.0?

[Eric Lemoine]

On Tuesday, February 2, 2010, Andreas Hocevar <ahocevar at opengeo.org> wrote:
> To me, it is important to do a thorough API review, as in my opinion we
> should guarantee API stability throughout the 1.x series.
>
> Such an API review includes questions like:
> * are things named properly? Like, is a config option that can just be a
> layerStore called layerStore (and not layers), as opposed to a config
> option that can either be an array of layers or a layerStore, in which
> case it should be called layers?
> * are things consistent with the way they are handled in Ext JS? Like,
> are we making use of standard config options like defaults, baseParams,
> baseAttrs properly?
> * Does our directory structure, the namespacing and the inheritance
> paths make sense?

I agree with an API review with the above questions in mind.

Regarding the web site I think we need to be able to publish
per-release documentations. In particular, we want a specific doc for
1.0, so people don't look at the trunk doc - the only one we have
right now - and think it's 1.0.

 Regards,

-- 
Eric Lemoine

Camptocamp France SAS
Savoie Technolac, BP 352
73377 Le Bourget du Lac, Cedex

Tel : 00 33 4 79 44 44 96
Mail : eric.lemoine at camptocamp.com
http://www.camptocamp.com