[Users] GeoExt 1.0?
Andreas Hocevar
ahocevar at opengeo.org
Mon Jan 25 11:41:20 CET 2010
Hi Eric,
thanks for the clarification. Posting something similar was on my to-do
this morning, and now I can mark this as done :-).
-Andreas.
Eric Lemoine wrote:
> On Friday, January 22, 2010, Christopher Schmidt
> <crschmidt at crschmidt.net> wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 12:02:53PM -0500, Yves Moisan wrote:
>>
>>> Editing tools need to allow at least snapping IMO. Otherwise they won't
>>> be used for "real" GIS/drawing work. A personal wish I have is to be
>>> able to position a point or a vertex at specific coordinates, but I
>>> understand that may not be a requirement for a 1.0. Snapping is though
>>> IMO.
>>>
>> Perhaps I'm confused about what GeoExt was. I thought it was a framework
>> to create attractive mapping applications more simply... not a replacement
>> for any particular tool (ArcView, ArcMap, or otherwise).
>>
>
> Yes, GeoExt is a (client-side) framework to create mapping apps, and I
> don't think there's desire to change that. We probably shouldn't talk
> about "tools"; "components" would be more appropriate I guess.
>
> I think Yves is just saying that he'd like that GeoExt provide
> high(er)-level components that would ease developing apps with editing
> functionality.
>
> As a side note: our goal with the user extensions (ux) is to provide
> high-level UI components targetting more specific user scenarios.
> These ux may be why the term "tool" came up; just a guess.
>
>
>> In that case, in my opinion, both of these things are not requirements
>> for a '1.0' release; GeoExt, as it is, makes it easier to create
>> user-friendly mapping applications. Tools like editing, styling, etc. are
>> not neccesarily part of a 1.0 release.
>>
>
> I agree. There are a couple of things we'd want to do before Release
> 1.0 though, like bringing some consistency in our APIs, and being able
> to publish per-release docs.
>
> Cheers,
>
>
--
Andreas Hocevar
OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org/
Expert service straight from the developers.
More information about the Users
mailing list